The UK's Supreme Court has ruled that in legal terms, the definition of a woman is rooted in biological sex, thus expressly excluding trans women from that definition. This unanimous decision, as articulated by Lord Hodge, highlights that while the Equality Act 2010 protects the rights of transgender individuals, it fundamentally identifies 'woman' through biological parameters. This ruling poses significant consequences for the trans and non-binary community, which may incite anxiety and concern among its members and allies, bringing forth a surge of public discourse and reactions across social media.
The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms woman and sex in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex.
The ruling could have wide-ranging implications for the trans and non-binary community across the country.
Lord Hodge has cautioned both sides involved in the case against reading this judgement as a triumph of one or more groups in our society.
Some people will be upset, some will be happy. Either way, it can all get a bit much at the best of times.
Collection
[
|
...
]