Human Evaluation of Large Audio-Language Models | HackerNoon
Briefly

The experiments highlighted a consistency level of 98.2% between GPT-4's evaluations and human judgments, indicating a robust alignment in decision-making processes.
In contrast, GPT-3.5 Turbo achieved a consistency rate of 96.4%, showing that while effective, it was slightly less aligned with human evaluations compared to GPT-4.
Read at Hackernoon
[
|
]