Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments | AdExchanger
Briefly

from AdExchanger2 months ago
Both the DOJ and Google provided revised findings of fact before trial's end, summarizing evidence, but differing views on what is 'common sense' and 'reasonable' persist.
AdExchangerhttps://www.adexchanger.com/platforms/google-and-the-doj-recap-their-cases-in-the-countdown-to-closing-arguments/
The DOJ stated, 'Over the course of three weeks, with testimony from dozens of witnesses, supported by hundreds of exhibits, the trial evidence proved what Plaintiffs alleged: Google is a monopolist illegally wielding control over the ad tech tools that market participants rely on for competitive bidding.'
AdExchangerhttps://www.adexchanger.com/platforms/google-and-the-doj-recap-their-cases-in-the-countdown-to-closing-arguments/
Judge Brinkema may provide an early draft opinion within three weeks, but a formal ruling is anticipated early next year, following scheduled closing arguments.
AdExchangerhttps://www.adexchanger.com/platforms/google-and-the-doj-recap-their-cases-in-the-countdown-to-closing-arguments/
The revised findings from both parties are extensive, with DOJ's document at 422 pages and Google's at 634 pages, reflecting their respective interpretations of the facts while lacking groundbreaking revelations.
AdExchangerhttps://www.adexchanger.com/platforms/google-and-the-doj-recap-their-cases-in-the-countdown-to-closing-arguments/
Read at AdExchanger
#google #antitrust #doj #ad-tech #legal-documents
[
|
]