The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has initiated an antitrust case against Meta, asserting that the company's previous acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp were illegal attempts to suppress competition. Lawyers for both sides presented arguments in court, with the FTC alleging that Meta prefers acquisitions over competition. In contrast, Meta's representatives maintained that their platforms have significantly improved, benefiting users and advertisers. Furthermore, discussions have surfaced regarding the influence of President Trump on the trial, particularly given Zuckerberg’s financial support for Trump's inauguration and prior settlements with him.
The Federal Trade Commission launched its antitrust case against Meta, claiming its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp were illegal moves to stifle competition.
FTC attorney Daniel Matheson stated that Meta decided it was easier to buy out rivals than compete, highlighting concerns over Meta's impact on market competition.
Meta's lawyer argued that the company's applications have improved and that increased usage reflects better quality, emphasizing a fundamental economic principle of enhanced value.
Speculation exists about President Trump potentially influencing the trial's outcome after Zuckerberg's financial contributions to his inaugural committee and responding to Trump's past lawsuits.
Collection
[
|
...
]