"It was just very clear from the very beginning that the court is just deeply uninterested in stretching the law to help TikTok here," said Alan Rozenshtein, a former Justice Department official. This perspective emphasizes the judicial sentiment toward the case, suggesting a lack of willingness to accommodate TikTok's arguments for legal protection.
Rozenshtein mentioned that he believes the appeals court will rule "decisively" and "comprehensively" against TikTok, indicating that the judges are likely to side with the government's stance regarding potential national security threats posed by the app.
"This is pretty in the bag for the government," said Rozenshtein, echoing a sentiment shared by various legal experts. This highlights the perception that the government holds a strong position in this legal conflict.
The law, signed by President Biden, gives TikTok's parent company ByteDance nine months to divest its US operations, showcasing the significant political and legal pressure TikTok faces in the U.S. regarding national security concerns.
Collection
[
|
...
]