SEO vs. GEO: A comparison for PR professionals - PR Daily
Briefly

SEO vs. GEO: A comparison for PR professionals - PR Daily
"Shifts in search behavior have elevated the importance of implementing generative engine optimization best practices. While SEO has long rewarded relevance and authority, GEO picks up on those same signals - favoring brands AI considers credible, consistent and well-referenced across the web. In this new landscape, success depends on a brand's total digital footprint - not just owned channels, but everywhere credibility can be earned: media coverage, websites, reviews, forums and social platforms."
"In the generative search era, the more credible, consistent signals you send, the more likely a brand is to be surfaced by generative engines. A well-placed article, interview or review doesn't just build human trust anymore - it trains the machines. When AI tools look for trustworthy mentions, they rely on entity consistency (using the same brand names, first-party research citations and expert quotes) and reputation signals (coverage in reputable trade publications, media outlets or authoritative sites)."
Shifts in search behavior prioritize generative engine optimization, which amplifies signals of credibility, consistency and web references. GEO evaluates a brand's total digital footprint across owned channels, media coverage, reviews, forums and social platforms. Earned media, expert quotes and first-party citations strengthen entity consistency and reputation signals that AI tools use to surface trusted sources. Public relations and media placements directly influence how algorithms recognize authority. Traditional SEO tactics remain relevant for discovery, but GEO raises the importance of coordinated PR, citation consistency and broad-based reputation management to optimize visibility in AI-driven search.
Read at PR Daily
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]