"Corporate bulls-t is defined as dubious information that is misleadingly impressive, important, informative, or otherwise engaging. It sounds smart but lacks accuracy or helpfulness."
"People who find buzzword-heavy corporate-speak profound perform worse on leadership and decision-making measures, but this does not mean they are bad at their jobs."
"The results were uniform across studies, showing that receptivity to corporate-speak is not about intelligence or education, as over 70% of participants had a bachelor's degree or higher."
"Using corporate jargon is often necessary to navigate the workspace, leading anyone to potentially fall for bulls-t when it's prevalent in their environment."
Corporate bulls-t refers to misleading language that sounds impressive but lacks accuracy or meaning. Shane Littrell's research indicates that individuals attracted to such jargon perform worse in leadership and decision-making roles. The study involved 1018 subjects and established the Corporate Bulls-t Receptivity Scale. Findings suggest that receptivity to corporate-speak does not correlate with intelligence or education level. The environment often necessitates the use of such language, leading individuals to fall for it despite their qualifications.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]