
"In the days following the fatal shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, numerous workers have been fired for their comments on his death, among them MSNBC political analyst Matthew Dowd. Several conservative activists have sought to identify social media users whose posts about Kirk they viewed as offensive or celebratory, targeting everyone from journalists to teachers. Right-wing influencer Laura Loomer said she would try to ruin the professional aspirations of anyone who celebrated Kirk's death."
"It's far from the first time workers have lost their jobs over things they say publicly including in social media posts. But the speed at which the firings have been happening raises questions about worker rights versus employer rights. In the U.S., laws can vary across states, but overall, there's very little legal protection for employees who are punished for speech made both in and out of private workplaces."
Multiple workers were fired after posting comments about conservative activist Charlie Kirk's fatal shooting; conservative activists pursued those they deemed celebratory, and influencers threatened to harm targets' careers. Private employers have broad discretion to discipline or fire employees for speech made on or off the job, and legal protections vary by state. Most private-sector employees lack robust protection for political or public speech. Social media has amplified employer scrutiny and enabled doxxing, making out-of-work conduct easier to track and weaponize. State examples like New York offer limited exceptions, but employer leeway remains significant.
Read at www.mercurynews.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]