In his piece, Peter Baker discusses how the Biden administration is weighing the option of blanket pardons ahead of potential retribution from Trump’s administration. The selection of individuals known for their partisan loyalties by Trump suggests a looming threat against his critics, leading to serious considerations about how to mitigate any fallout.
Mark Joseph Stern argues that Neil Gorsuch’s sudden recusal from a case shouldn’t be interpreted as a sign of greater ethical standards among justices. Instead, it reflects a troubling tendency of the Court to operate without the necessary checks, raising questions about accountability and integrity within Supreme Court procedures.
Laura Schulte reports on the significance of Act 10 as it pertains to the upcoming state Supreme Court election. This pivotal legislation aimed at labor rights has become a central point of contention, indicating its potential to shape judicial priorities and voter sentiments in the election arena.
In Claire L. Parins’ analysis, William Baude's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, especially in the context of Trump v. Anderson, has sparked substantial debate. His firm stance on the case underscores the broader implications of constitutional interpretations in contentious political climates.
Collection
[
|
...
]