How Appealing Weekly Roundup
Briefly

In a recent essay, Ian Millhiser emphasizes the necessity of cherishing our discontent toward the Supreme Court and scrutinizing its most controversial decisions. Engaging with these grievances is crucial for accountability.
The Eleventh Circuit's recent decision highlights a major shift in its approach to healthcare exclusions for transgender employees. This full court reconsideration indicates the potential for a more conservative stance, contrasting earlier rulings.
Bayer’s recent appeal victory regarding Roundup raises important implications for future cancer lawsuits. The appeal court's finding, indicating that federal law may supersede warning claims suggests a significant legal precedent that could reach the Supreme Court.
Johnson & Johnson's strategic move to the Texas venue for Baby Powder litigation reflects a tactical shift aimed at more favorable outcomes for claims regarding cancer risks associated with their product.
Read at Above the Law
[
|
]