Mark Meadows' request to move his election interference case to federal court, where he could argue he's immune from prosecution, has been swiftly rejected by the Supreme Court
Briefly

"A White House chief of staff facing criminal charges based on actions relating to his work for the president of the United States should not be a close call - especially now that this court has recognized that federal immunity impacts what evidence can be considered, not just what conduct can form the basis for liability," his attorneys wrote.
"Prosecutors said that Meadows failed to show he was carrying out official duties during the alleged scheme, including participating in a phone call where Trump suggested Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger could help 'find' votes he needed to win the state."
Read at Fortune
[
|
]