2 Rough Social Media Rulings Could Actually Improve the Platforms | Muse by Clios
Briefly

2 Rough Social Media Rulings Could Actually Improve the Platforms | Muse by Clios
"A Santa Fe jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million after finding the company willfully violated New Mexico's consumer protection laws by misleading users about the safety of its platforms and enabling child sexual exploitation."
"The very next day, a Los Angeles jury found both Meta and YouTube liable for negligently designing addictive platforms that contributed to the depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts of a young woman who began using social media at age 6."
"New Mexico's attorney general is already asking for real age verification, changes to algorithms, and independent oversight of Meta's platforms."
"For most brands, these rulings will have a positive impact. Environment and context are often overlooked in media planning."
Juries in New Mexico and California found Meta and YouTube liable for harming children through misleading practices and addictive platform designs. Meta was ordered to pay $375 million for violating consumer protection laws, while YouTube faced a $6 million verdict for contributing to a young woman's mental health issues. These rulings may lead to significant changes in how social media platforms operate, particularly regarding young users. Advertisers should view these developments positively, as they emphasize the importance of context and environment in media planning.
[
|
]