Brett Kavanaugh Is Using the Logic of Dobbs to Pursue a Dangerous New Agenda
Briefly

The hearing signaled a troubling stance from the Supreme Court's conservative justices, raising concerns about their commitment to well-established principles of gender equality and civil rights.
The case highlights stark disparities in healthcare access for trans youth compared to their cisgender counterparts, exposing a fundamental issue of sex discrimination in Tennessee's law.
The arguments presented suggest a potential retreat from decades of legal protections for transgender individuals and raise questions about the court's willingness to protect established civil rights.
Skrmetti v. U.S. illustrates the urgent need for the judiciary to uphold constitutional protections against discrimination amid increasing political pressure to normalize gender conformity.
Read at Slate Magazine
[
|
]