The USPTO's termination of about 3,100 patent applications due to fraudulent use of a practitioner's signature raises significant concerns about punishing innocent applicants.
One attorney remarked that 'punishing the applicants for the actions of the practitioner goes a bit far, especially where the punishment is termination with no remedy,' highlighting the disproportionate impact on these applicants.
The fallout of this situation may push some affected applicants to seek judicial review, as the actions of the USPTO are seen as overly harsh and abrupt.
Many applicants involved turned to W&K, a firm they believed was reputable, only to face termination of their patent applications due to misconduct they were unaware of.
Collection
[
|
...
]