Provisur Technologies has filed a petition for certiorari challenging the Federal Circuit's review of jury verdicts in patent cases, particularly around willful infringement. This case illustrates tension between jury fact-finding and appellate court evaluations, emphasizing the legal standards in determining willful infringement.
The key contention in the petition is that the Federal Circuit improperly rejected the jury's findings, essentially conducting a reexamination of facts that undermines the jury's role in determining culpability in patent infringement cases.
The dispute revolves around the legality of the appellate court's scrutiny on willful infringement determinations, where Provisur argues that such scrutiny disrupts established legal precedents governing jury verdicts and the standard for judgment as a matter of law.
In Provisur's view, the appellate court's rejection of the jury's verdict and related damages enhancement reflects a significant shift away from respecting jury findings which are foundational in ensuring fairness and consistency in patent litigation.
Collection
[
|
...
]