The Federal Circuit's unanimous en banc decision initiated a detailed examination of Rule 702, potentially reshaping standards for expert testimony in patent cases, particularly on damages.
In EcoFactor v. Google, the court upheld the district court's discretion in admitting EcoFactor's damages expert testimony, while dissent noted it muddles precedent regarding reliable inputs and methodology.
The recent trend showed the Federal Circuit's consistent dismissal of mandamus petitions related to venue issues, signaling a more unified approach against such claims.
After multiple precedent-setting opinions, the implications of these decisions could significantly influence future patent litigation strategies, especially regarding evidence and expert testimony standards.
Collection
[
|
...
]