The U.S. Supreme Court denied several petitions for writ of certiorari concerning intellectual property cases, including those challenging Section 101 rulings at the summary judgment stage. One notable case involved Harris Brumfield, who contested the Federal Circuitâs decisions regarding the patent eligibility of business methods and the applicability of FRCP 60(b)(3) for a new trial due to alleged fraud. This reflects ongoing complexities in patent law, particularly regarding judicial exceptions to patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and the requirement of reasonable diligence.
The U.S. Supreme Court denied cert petitions which challenged summary judgments on Section 101 rulings, despite claims of factual disputes, indicating a trend of upholding such decisions.
Harris Brumfield's challenge on behalf of Ascent Trust highlights ongoing issues with patent eligibility and judicial discretion under Section 101, reflecting dissatisfaction with the Federal Circuit's interpretations.
Collection
[
|
...
]