The petition argues that the Federal Circuit has consistently exceeded its boundary by making independent factual findings rather than adhering to the district court's analyses, which is a fundamental error.
Judge Tiffany Cunningham's dissent highlights the danger of appellate courts making factual determinations that were unsupported in the original trial, emphasizing the need to respect the district court's role.
Court of Appeals are tasked with reviewing the legal correctness of the district court's conclusions, not re-evaluating factual evidence presented in lower courts.
The core of this appeal centers around the evidentiary standards and the appropriate framework for appellate review when new factual determinations surface.
Collection
[
|
...
]