The ECHR ruled in favor of a French woman divorced for refusing to engage in sexual relations, establishing a violation of her human rights under Article 8. Supported by feminist groups, she argued that the ruling infringed on her private life and autonomy. The case reflects broader societal issues regarding marital obligations and consent, particularly in light of growing concerns over rape culture, exemplified by the Pelicot case. This ruling reopens discussions on the rights of women within marriage and the legal implications surrounding consent.
The court ruled that the facts of the case established a serious violation of the duties and obligations of marriage, making shared life intolerable.
Feminist groups backed the appeal, deploring French justice's continued imposition of marital duties, denying women the right to consent to sexual relations.
Collection
[
|
...
]