"They sear in two minutes, poach in three, and somehow sing across nearly every savory profile. Close your eyes and picture them raw and tangy, marinated in aguachile, or tossed with gochujang and honey, simmered in a Thai curry, cold with horseradish-y cocktail sauce, nestled in a scampi or fra diavolo, or wrapped in a warm corn tortilla with cilantro and lime."
"From a mercury standpoint, yes. Because shrimp sit low on the marine food chain and don't accumulate as much mercury like bigger, long-living fish do. For most healthy adults, daily shrimp doesn't run the same risks that a daily tuna habit might. The bigger question is what else comes with that routine: Saturated monotony, missing micronutrients, cholesterol nuance, additives in cheaper frozen bags, and the ethical quandary of how shrimp are raised and harvested."
"Drifting into a shrimp-every-night routine is understandable, but it's borderline the same energy as gym bros eating chicken breast and rice every day because it "gets in the macros," even though it slowly drains the joy and diversity out of the diet. Hitting protein goals is good, but hitting the wide spread of micronutrients human bodies need to stay balanced is better."
Shrimp are quick-cooking, versatile seafood that pairs with many cuisines and flavor profiles. Shrimp sit low on the marine food chain and generally have low mercury content, so daily consumption carries much less mercury risk than larger, long-lived fish. Regular reliance on shrimp risks nutritional monotony and potential gaps in micronutrients, and raises questions about dietary cholesterol and additives found in some low-cost frozen products. Shrimp production also poses ethical and environmental concerns related to farming and harvesting practices. Shrimp work well in rotation, but using them as the sole protein source can leave essential nutrients missing.
Read at Tasting Table
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]