The article discusses the primary motivations behind migration from Africa to Europe and Latin America to the U.S., highlighting income disparity and lifestyle differences. It argues that historical patterns of migration reflect the pursuit of better living conditions. The author suggests that instead of restricting immigration, supporting economic development in home countries is more effective and humane. The history of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is examined, noting its dual role in promoting aid and serving national interests against rival influences like the Soviet Union and China.
The biggest reason for immigration from Africa to Europe and from Latin America to the United States is the disparity of income and resulting lifestyle differences.
It's more cost-effective and humane to assist people in their home country than to build walls to keep them out of ours.
USAID has been driven by far more than just altruism. It also had a nationalist agenda, originally to counter Soviet engagement in developing countries.
USAID has served the national interest by developing markets, making countries more stable trading partners and reducing unnecessary migration.
Collection
[
|
...
]