The Supreme Court is currently debating whether ghost guns, assembled from kits at home, should be classified as firearms under federal law, igniting concerns over public safety.
With the law defining firearms broadly to include anything that expels a projectile, the argument hinges on whether ghost guns and their components fit this classification.
The justices focused more on linguistic interpretation of the law rather than its intent, leading to uncertainty about the outcome despite a clear public safety angle.
Reflecting on a previous case involving bump stocks, the court's reluctance to prioritize the law's purpose over textual interpretation raises concerns about future firearm regulations.
Collection
[
|
...
]