A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order halting Elon Musk and the DOGE team's access to the Social Security Administration's systems. The ruling, prompted by a lawsuit from labor unions and advocacy groups, deemed their actions a risky 'fishing expedition' that threatened Americans' private data. Judge Ellen Hollander's memorandum outlined legal concerns regarding privacy violations, making clear that DOGE's justification for data access was inadequate. This decision raises substantial questions about the balance between anti-fraud measures and the protection of personal information in federal agencies.
The DOGE Team is essentially engaged in a fishing expedition at SSA, in search of a fraud epidemic, based on little more than suspicion.
Judge Ellen Hollander's memorandum emphasized the potential risks to personal data, highlighting that DOGE failed to justify its invasive access to private information.
This lawsuit arises amid concerns about the appropriateness of methods used by federal teams in pursuit of rooting out fraud from agencies.
The temporary restraining order reflects serious legal implications regarding the privacy rights of millions under federal protections.
Collection
[
|
...
]