According to university officials, the building is no longer viable due to "its aging infrastructure" that can no longer meet contemporary needs.
Architect Stephen Hodder argues that the decision to demolish is not justified, emphasizing that aging infrastructure should not condemn a building less than 30 years old.
The Twentieth Century Society asserts that the demolition is "wholly irresponsible and unnecessary," urging the university to reconsider as the building has opportunities for adaptive re-use.
Hodder points out that this decision contradicts the university's sustainability claims, as demolition would generate significant carbon emissions.
Collection
[
|
...
]