After comparing chicken tenders from Sonic, KFC, and Smashburger, Smashburger stood out for its large and well-breaded tenders that provided excellent flavor. KFC, despite its reputation, disappointed with smaller and lackluster tenders that were the most expensive of the group. The reviewer emphasized a focus on plain tenders to evaluate flavor without dips. Overall, Smashburger's tenders were notably satisfying, while KFC's offerings did not meet expectations, raising questions about value and quality in chicken tenders.
Smashburger's chicken tenders were large, generously breaded, and all-around excellent, easily twice as large as the other chains leading to a satisfying experience.
In contrast, KFC's tenders were disappointing both in size and flavor, costing more yet failing to impress in a fast-food setting known for chicken.
Collection
[
|
...
]