The article critiques the Chicago Tribune's editorial opposing a ban on methane gas in new buildings, emphasizing that such a ban is essential for combating climate change. It argues that electrifying homes could lead to significant cost savings over time and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Contrary to the Tribune's concerns regarding affordability and electricity demand, the piece points out that methane gas is an expensive heating source and transitioning to electric heat pumps could yield substantial emissions reductions. The discussion also highlights the importance of energizing public discourse on this issue.
The editorial board is afraid that a methane gas ban would make buildings less affordable. We don't understand the board's position because as a power source, methane gas is far more expensive than electricity to heat our homes and businesses.
In reality, a methane gas ban would significantly reduce Chicago's greenhouse gas emissions. According to the 'City of Chicago Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report,' residential buildings contributed 27% of emissions.
Collection
[
|
...
]