Gig Companies Spent $200 Million to Write Their Own Labor Law. The State Supreme Court Could Throw it Out | KQED
Briefly

from Kqed1 month ago
The California Supreme Court is set to hear a case that could have significant implications for over 1 million gig workers in the state and potentially reshape the gig economy as we know it.
Kqedhttps://www.kqed.org/news/11986533/gig-companies-spent-200-million-to-write-their-own-labor-law-the-state-supreme-court-could-throw-it-out
Proposition 22 provided some benefits for app-based platform workers, but critics argue that it falls short of establishing a comprehensive workers' compensation system, raising concerns about setting a precedent for industry-specific labor laws.
Kqedhttps://www.kqed.org/news/11986533/gig-companies-spent-200-million-to-write-their-own-labor-law-the-state-supreme-court-could-throw-it-out
The debate revolves around the interpretation of a constitutional amendment from 1918, with gig companies arguing that it doesn't limit voters' power to legislate on workers' compensation, while opponents caution against the potential broader implications of allowing corporations to bypass existing labor laws.
Kqedhttps://www.kqed.org/news/11986533/gig-companies-spent-200-million-to-write-their-own-labor-law-the-state-supreme-court-could-throw-it-out
Opponents of Proposition 22 warn of a slippery slope, fearing that allowing companies to create their own labor laws could lead to a further transformation of work structures in various industries, affecting workers, the government, and society at large.
Kqedhttps://www.kqed.org/news/11986533/gig-companies-spent-200-million-to-write-their-own-labor-law-the-state-supreme-court-could-throw-it-out
Read at Kqed
#california-supreme-court #gig-workers #proposition-22 #workers-compensation #labor-laws
[
add
]
[
|
|
]