"What makes LinkedIn uniquely powerful is not just its scale but its authenticity. It is the only major social platform where most people are verifiably real - not bots, not burners, not pseudonyms. It holds the cleanest, most trustworthy identity graph on the internet: a network tied to real employers, real skills, real locations, and real career histories. This should have been LinkedIn's greatest advantage. It is the foundation every modern professional platform wishes it had."
"Yet LinkedIn has never built the product layer that fully unlocks that value. Authenticity is treated as table stakes - a security measure - rather than the engine for innovation. Meanwhile, the rest of the internet has reorganized itself into specialized ecosystems built for speed, creativity, learning, and AI-native knowledge - and LinkedIn didn't move with it. It has the richest data, the highest integrity, and the most durable network effects - but lacks the product ambition to match."
LinkedIn has remained largely unchanged since its 2016 acquisition by Microsoft and has not adapted to shifts toward video, creator-driven learning, and agentic AI. The platform’s chief asset is a highly authentic identity graph tied to real employers, skills, locations, and career histories, yet that asset is used mainly for security rather than as a foundation for product innovation. Competing ecosystems have specialized for speed, creativity, learning, and AI-native knowledge while LinkedIn retained dominance without matching product ambition. The platform possesses unmatched data integrity and network effects but has failed to translate them into modern, compelling professional experiences.
Read at Forbes
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]