How Many Glitch Tokens Hide in Popular LLMs? Revelations from Large-Scale Testing | HackerNoon
Briefly

The article discusses a study on detecting under-trained tokens in language models using predictive indicators. Through extensive testing on models such as Zephyr-beta and OLMo v1.7, the authors found that their simplistic indicators significantly improved the detection of under-trained tokens, outperforming traditional methods. The effectiveness was quantified in terms of token frequency correlations, and results indicated consistent performance across various models. Detailed results and individual model analyses are available in their repository, emphasizing the practical implications for enhancing model outputs and reducing unintended consequences.
Our findings show that while simple, the indicators are highly predictive of token prediction probabilities, signifying their effectiveness in detecting under-trained tokens.
Analysis of the Zephyr-beta model indicates that careful verification can significantly improve the accuracy of under-trained token detection compared to just top candidates.
Indicators are strongly correlated with token frequency in training datasets, revealing insights into how these variables affect token performance in different models.
The use of these indicators proved more effective in predicting potential unwanted outputs rather than conventional prompting techniques, highlighting their unique utility.
Read at Hackernoon
[
|
]