The article discusses the inadequate media coverage of major protests, focusing on the recent 'Hands Off' rallies. It highlights how corporate ownership of U.S. news media has consistently limited reporting on significant public gatherings, drawing parallels to historical events like the Iraq War protests and Occupy Wall Street. Major print outlets, despite their influence, have provided minimal coverage of such events, underscoring a disconnect between media narratives and public interests. The article also emphasizes that movements need to adapt their strategies in response to the current media landscape instead of relying on older methodologies.
In an era of corporate media dominance, protests like the 'Hands Off' rallies suffer from insufficient coverage, leading to a public misinformed about important issues.
The corporate ownership of U.S. news media results in a lack of coverage for significant public protests, a trend observed since the Iraq War.
Despite major protests, media coverage remains inadequate, indicating that movements must adapt to contemporary media landscapes rather than clinging to outdated methods.
The limited attention given to significant protests by leading print media outlets suggests a strategic avoidance of topics unpopular with the business class.
Collection
[
|
...
]