The argument against AI agents and unnecessary automation
Briefly

The current wave of generative AI, termed the 'agentic era' by some, may lead to disillusionment as most individuals find little use for AI agents in routine activities. Many tasks like booking trips or ordering groceries are better suited for human assistants, which are already utilized by those with affluent lifestyles. Despite advancements in AI technology, the practical applications offered by solutions like OpenAI's Operator do not represent a significant breakthrough, as they largely replicate existing capabilities rather than innovate new solutions for everyday users.
"The 'agentic era' might disappoint as many don’t need AI agents for simple tasks—they favor human assistants, especially titans of industry and celebrities."
"The tech-besotted believe everyone longs for their own Jarvis, but mundane tasks don’t warrant an AI servant, as they can be managed by humans more efficiently."
"AI agents face practical limitations. While combining generative AI with multimodal capabilities seems advanced, the web automation they enable isn’t particularly new or groundbreaking."
"The example tasks demonstrated for OpenAI's Operator show its dependence on specific online services, hinting at a lack of genuine innovation in utilitarian applications."
Read at Theregister
[
|
]