"The AI gold rush these days is littered with abandoned enterprise projects, with humans - not the technology itself - being blamed for high failure rates of AI projects. Recent data indicates that stagnant AI projects were often the result of poor vision, mismanagement, and a lack of resources. Eagerness from the top to become "AI-first" companies is also putting pressure on C-suite execs and other IT decision-makers who might not have the budgets, systems, or tools for success."
"Early-stage venture capital (VC) firms act as validators of AI technologies. Partners are usually as engaged as the founders of AI startups, attending meetings with tech leaders, prototyping, and guiding portfolio companies. But VCs and CIOs have different risk profiles and priorities when it comes to AI. "When the CIOs are involved, it's in a very different way.... That CIO is thinking about whether or not they're going to get fired," said Julia Moore, managing partner at Breakout Ventures."
Enterprise AI projects often fail due to poor vision, mismanagement, and insufficient resources, with human factors blamed more than the technology itself. Top-down pressure to become "AI-first" increases expectations while straining budgets, systems, and tools. Early-stage venture capital firms validate AI technologies and engage deeply with startups through meetings, prototyping, and guidance. Venture capitalists and IT leaders operate with different risk profiles and priorities, and CIOs face job-security pressures when implementing AI. The AI learning curve for IT leaders is steep and resembles past technology shifts. Organizations should evaluate how AI will change business structures and operations for long-term visibility of outcomes.
Read at Computerworld
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]