In his letter to Judge William Alsup, Boucher states that the complaint mischaracterizes his work, leading to reputational harm and incorrect media portrayal as a 'fraudster.' He clarifies that his books are derived from his imagination and that he does not engage in deceptive practices or attribute his work to other authors. Boucher expresses concern over the representation of his work as exemplary of deceptive AI content, underlining the need for accuracy in legal claims.
Boucher emphasizes that he has never paid Anthropic for AI services, arguing that his work should not be cited to support allegations against them. He asserts, 'I do not copy or rip off the books of others,' explaining that his use of AI tools is meant to bring his original vision to fruition. He calls for plaintiffs to correct the record regarding his contributions to the discourse surrounding AI-generated content.
Expressing his disappointment, Boucher critiques the plaintiffs' attorneys for their negligence, stating, 'The lack of care exhibited by the plaintiffs' attorneys was unnecessary, unjust, and cruel.' He calls for more consideration for those affected by litigation tactics, reinforcing the notion that legal disputes should not overlook the dignity and reputation of individuals.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]