A US district judge ruled that Apple willfully violated a previous injunction aimed at preventing anticompetitive conduct related to its App Store. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers determined that internal documents revealed Apple's intent to undermine competition and that a top executive lied under oath. This ruling, stemming from a case initiated by Epic Games, could lead to criminal contempt proceedings as the court referred the matter to the US Attorney. Apple expressed disagreement with the ruling and indicated plans to appeal while reaffirming its commitment to compliance.
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers highlighted that internal documents indicated Apple was aware of its actions and chose "the most anticompetitive option" at every turn, which points to a deliberate strategy to undermine competition.
In finding Apple in contempt, Judge Gonzalez Rogers referred the case to the US Attorney, suggesting potential criminal proceedings for willful violations of injunctions aimed at fostering fair competition.
Collection
[
|
...
]