In the version of the article initially published, in Fig. 2a, the y axis of the middle panel was shifted upwards and has now been moved down so that 0 is level with the x axis. In Fig. 3a, the RGB pixels dashed red line has been shortened for clarity. In Extended Data Fig. 2, the y-axis label was W (100 to 200 nm) but should have been W (100 to 220 nm).
Following publication of this article, we were alerted via PubPeer to an inadvertent image duplication in Extended Fig. 7b in our paper. Upon carefully examining all the figures, we have discovered another duplication error in Extended Fig. 3g. The errors occurred during figure preparation by using placeholder images originating from similar areas of a well. The errors do not compromise the results or the conclusions of our work.