Supreme Court Patent Challenges February 2025The Supreme Court's upcoming patent docket features key challenges that could reshape patent law, particularly concerning procedural practices and core substantive issues.
The Federal Circuit's Oracle: When Silence Speaks Louder Than WordsThe Supreme Court may reform the Federal Circuit's use of no-opinion summary affirmances in patent cases, addressing transparency issues.
Million-Dollar Mysteries: Recent Complex Patent Cases Lost to Rule 36The Federal Circuit's use of Rule 36 affirmances for complex patent cases raises concerns about inadequate judicial scrutiny.
The Federal Circuit's Blind Spot: ParkerVision and the Problem of Invisible ReasoningThe Federal Circuit's Rule 36 practice undermines accountability and violates statutory requirements for written opinions in patent case appeals.
Institutional Stonewalling: The Federal Circuit's Silent Treatment Through Rule 36Stonewalling in relationships parallels the Federal Circuit's Rule 36 summary affirmances, stifling meaningful engagement and progress in legal arguments.
The Silent Circuit: The Growing Backlash against Rule 36 No Opinion Judgments from the Federal CircuitThe Federal Circuit's no-opinion judgments are under scrutiny, with multiple amicus briefs advocating for a Supreme Court review.ParkerVision's legal challenge highlights the necessity of issuing detailed opinions in patent cases.
Supreme Court Patent Challenges February 2025The Supreme Court's upcoming patent docket features key challenges that could reshape patent law, particularly concerning procedural practices and core substantive issues.
The Federal Circuit's Oracle: When Silence Speaks Louder Than WordsThe Supreme Court may reform the Federal Circuit's use of no-opinion summary affirmances in patent cases, addressing transparency issues.
Million-Dollar Mysteries: Recent Complex Patent Cases Lost to Rule 36The Federal Circuit's use of Rule 36 affirmances for complex patent cases raises concerns about inadequate judicial scrutiny.
The Federal Circuit's Blind Spot: ParkerVision and the Problem of Invisible ReasoningThe Federal Circuit's Rule 36 practice undermines accountability and violates statutory requirements for written opinions in patent case appeals.
Institutional Stonewalling: The Federal Circuit's Silent Treatment Through Rule 36Stonewalling in relationships parallels the Federal Circuit's Rule 36 summary affirmances, stifling meaningful engagement and progress in legal arguments.
The Silent Circuit: The Growing Backlash against Rule 36 No Opinion Judgments from the Federal CircuitThe Federal Circuit's no-opinion judgments are under scrutiny, with multiple amicus briefs advocating for a Supreme Court review.ParkerVision's legal challenge highlights the necessity of issuing detailed opinions in patent cases.
ParkerVision is Latest to Petition SCOTUS for Review of CAFC's 'Heavy Reliance' on Rule 36The CAFC's frequent Rule 36 affirmances raise legal questions regarding the requirement for reasoned opinions under 35 U.S.C. § 144.