#judicial-ethics

#judicial-ethics

Judge Merchan will not recuse himself despite repeated claims of bias from Trump's legal team, supported by an ethics committee's opinion.

Justice Juan M. Merchan's role in the Trump case epitomizes the intense scrutiny judges face in high-profile legal battles.

Justice Alito's call with Trump about a former clerk raises concerns about judicial protocol and ethics.

Judicial impartiality must be upheld, even amidst personal relationships; a New Hampshire justice's indictment illustrates the conflict of interest.

The judge overseeing J.Lo and Affleck's divorce has ties to both parties but claims no conflict of interest.

Judge O'Connor rejected recusal motion despite owning Tesla stock, asserting no conflict of interest exists in overseeing X Corp.'s lawsuit against Media Matters.

Judge Joshua Kindred's resignation highlights serious allegations of sexual misconduct and conflicts of interest in the judicial system.

Ethical lapses in the judiciary can lead to significant conflicts of interest, undermining the integrity of legal proceedings.

The appeals court denied Melissa Quintanilla's attempt to disqualify a judge due to alleged bias linked to her relationship with the prosecution.

Congress has constitutional authority to enforce ethics rules for the U.S. Supreme Court.

The report emphasizes the urgency for congressional action regarding judicial accountability.

Trump seeks Supreme Court intervention in New York case, previously concealed hush money scheme.

Justice Alito's phone call with Trump raises questions about judicial ethics and conflicts of interest.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson critiques the Supreme Court's recent rulings while advocating for accountability and ethical standards within the judiciary.

A federal judge faced consequences for critiquing a Supreme Court Justice's improper conduct, indicating a troubling trend in judicial accountability.

Judge Ponsor apologized after being found in violation of ethics for criticizing Justice Alito in a New York Times op-ed.

Judicial conduct is under scrutiny due to serious allegations against a judge.

Boutique law firms are offering significantly higher bonuses than traditional firms.

Rising bonuses may indicate increasing workloads in the legal profession.

Mergers in legal firms lead to all-equity partnerships and significant shifts in the industry.

Judge Shelley M. Richmond Joseph allegedly misled authorities, creating a reasonable impression that she allowed an immigrant to evade ICE.

California AG dismisses case against critic of DA Price, raising concerns over potential political retaliation.

Judicial misconduct has historical roots, showing that concerns over ethics are not new in the legal profession.

Judge Bertoli's attempts to block the renaming of his high school resulted in a public admonishment for compromising his judicial responsibility.

Judge Bronwyn Miller faces scrutiny for pressuring the State Attorney and criticizing attorneys in a high-profile criminal case.

Judges must maintain a high standard of integrity, avoiding behavior that could demean their office, especially in the age of social media.

Justice Alito's acceptance of a knighthood suggests a troubling disconnect from U.S. democratic values and a monarchy-like belief in his own superiority.

The GOP in North Carolina is using ethics complaints to undermine Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs' campaign, contradicting their claims of protecting institutional integrity.

The ethics complaint against Justice Allison Riggs centers on her campaign statements about reproductive rights, raising questions about partisan motivations.

A judge was suspended for lip-syncing explicit music videos on TikTok, violating ethical standards related to integrity and professionalism.

Social media posts can have unintended consequences.

Judicial ethics are critical in maintaining trust in the legal system.

Allegations of harassment can lead to legal action.

A judge overseeing a Boeing lawsuit sold Boeing stock without disclosure, raising concerns about conflicts of interest in the judiciary.

Silence can be powerful in certain situations, like legal proceedings.