A recent ruling from the Fifth Circuit Appeals Court scrutinizes the actions of Louisiana judge Paul Bonin, who allegedly compromised due process by mandating defendants use a specific ankle monitoring company. This company, ETOH Monitoring, was founded by his former law partners, raising concerns of favoritism and ethical violations. The class-action lawsuit brought by parolees reveals that Bonin routinely neglected to inform defendants about other available monitoring options, directing them to ETOH and maintaining close oversight of their payment statuses, further complicating the issue of judicial impartiality and integrity.
In a recent Fifth Circuit ruling, a lawsuit against a Louisiana judge highlighted significant concerns over due process, emphasizing judicial impropriety in his favoritism towards a specific monitoring contractor.
Judge Bonin's conduct, favoring ETOH Monitoring which was founded by his former law partners, raises serious ethical questions and undermines the integrity of the judicial process.
Collection
[
|
...
]