"Here's something I've noticed in clinical work: The beliefs that cause the most trouble aren't the ones clients are thinking about. They're the ones clients are thinking with. A client tells me she's worthless. When I ask how she knows this, she offers evidence: her father's criticism, her failed marriage, her stalled career. Each piece of evidence makes sense to her because she's already interpreting through the lens of worthlessness. She's not reasoning toward the conclusion "I am worthless." She's reasoning from it."
"Plato recognized that certain beliefs have a special status. They're not conclusions we arrive at through deliberation. They're the starting points that make deliberation possible. They're what we reason from. Consider how decisions actually work. "Should I take this job?" You weigh salary, location, growth potential, and work-life balance. But those considerations only matter because you're already committed to certain principles about what a good life involves. The principles aren't outputs of this particular decision; they're the archai from which the decision proceeds."
Certain core beliefs function as starting points for reasoning rather than conclusions reached through deliberation. Plato called these organizing principles archai and described them as origins that often operate outside conscious awareness. These archai govern decision-making by determining which considerations count as relevant, and they shape the interpretation of experiences so that evidence is filtered through preexisting commitments. Clinical examples show that people interpret life events through these governing beliefs, reasoning from them rather than toward them. Evaluating which principle governs the soul reveals deeper criteria for judgment than merely adaptive versus maladaptive tests.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]