Locke’s approach to skepticism acknowledges that while we may not arrive at absolute certainty, we can still engage with the world practically. This pragmatic view allows for a constructive relationship with skepticism, enabling us to navigate knowledge claims without falling prey to paralyzing doubt.
The first argument against skepticism, which questions the justification of beliefs, leads to an infinite regression of questioning. This cycle illustrates the complexity of justifying knowledge, leaving skepticism largely unassailable and highlighting the challenges of establishing a firm epistemological foundation.
Collection
[
|
...
]