10 years after the Charlie Hebdo attacks in France, conversations about free speech are still too black and white
Briefly

The 2015 Charlie Hebdo attack resulted in global discourse on freedom of expression, often symbolized by 'Je suis Charlie'. However, reactions differ, particularly among French Muslims, who view the magazine as perpetuating harmful stereotypes. Discussions about satire must consider religious marginalization and political exclusion. Effective satire should 'punch up, not down', critiquing those in power while avoiding ridicule of already vulnerable groups, as evidenced by historical and contemporary examples of impactful satire that challenges authority rather than targets marginalized communities.
In political satire, the ethical boundaries need to favor targeting those in power rather than vulnerable communities, which generally face systemic oppression.
The slogan 'Je suis Charlie' represented support for freedom of expression, yet highlighted a divide in perceptions of Charlie Hebdo's caricatures among different communities.
Read at The Conversation
[
|
]