In pre-publication testing, a recovery memoir demonstrated not only the absence of harm but also a significant positive impact on individuals struggling with anorexia.
This study raises critical questions about the ethical responsibilities of writers, agents, and publishers in assessing whether their work should be published.
The research establishes that asking, 'Should this be published?' is not just a formality but an essential part of the ethical duty to potential readers.
The results suggest a promising avenue for changing publication practices, emphasizing the need for ethically-informed decisions in the realm of recovery narratives.
Collection
[
|
...
]