""No president is legally allowed to tear down portions of the White House without any review whatsoever—not President Trump, not President Biden, and not anyone else.""
"The National Trust for Historic Preservation argued that the President is a temporary tenant of the White House—its steward, not its landlord, a notion echoed in the judge's opinion."
"The government argues that ceasing construction would endanger national security, despite the legal challenges and public outcry surrounding the project."
"Public comments released by the NCPC included over 9,000 pages of criticism, with one woman imploring, 'NO GAUDY FAKE GOLD STUFF ALL OVER THE PLACE.'"
The National Trust for Historic Preservation successfully obtained a preliminary injunction against the White House's $400 million expansion project, citing the need for congressional approval. The Trust contends that the president is merely a steward of the White House, not its landlord. Legal challenges arose after the Commission on Fine Arts approved the design, while public comments criticized the project. The government claims halting construction could jeopardize national security, but the Trust maintains that no president can demolish parts of the White House without review.
Read at Axios
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]