The article discusses the complexity behind the phrase 'think for oneself,' highlighting its implications of agency and responsibility that differ from other interpretations in Chinese. This distinction emphasizes the need for cognitive independence, particularly in an era dominated by AI. The author shares a personal experience regarding a company-wide design system initiative, which improved productivity metrics yet inadvertently hindered innovation. The piece advocates for independence not just in thought but also in software engineering, asserting the importance of building and learning autonomously to foster creativity.
The English phrase 'think for oneself' establishes a relationship of agency and responsibility, distinct from thinking in isolation or merely about oneself.
In the age of AI, the imperative to think for oneself is about maintaining our cognitive sovereignty amidst machines processing information.
Innovation slowed under the design system initiative, reflecting a gradual calcification where consistency stifled creative problem-solving.
We must extend the principle of 'thinking for oneself' to software engineering and learning, emphasizing independence in all creative endeavors.
Collection
[
|
...
]