Figma Sites: innovation or exploitation?
Briefly

The article emphasizes the importance of using semantic HTML elements and meaningful class structures in web development. It argues that elements like <header> and <section> improve code readability and accessibility for assistive technologies. Additionally, proper semantic structure is crucial for SEO, enabling search engines to effectively index content. The author expresses concern that Figma Sites, as a low-code tool, prioritizes ease of use over quality coding practices, potentially leading designers to publish subpar code. This raises questions about Figma's commitment to providing reliable development tools.
Proper class structures are essential for readability and maintainability; semantic HTML elements like <header>, <nav>, and <article> provide clarity and improve accessibility.
Semantic structures are crucial for SEO; if a site uses meaningless classes and <div> tags, search engines struggle to index and understand content hierarchy effectively.
Figma Sites seems to prioritize ease of use over code quality, potentially misleading designers about the standards of the generated code.
The criticism of Figma Sites raises questions about the company's commitment to quality coding practices versus simply jumping on the low-code trend.
Read at Medium
[
|
]