The article discusses the Trump administration's approach to litigation, particularly in the context of expedited deportations of foreign nationals. The Supreme Court faces the issue of a trial court's order regarding halting expulsions, but the underlying question is about the trustworthiness of the administration's rapid legal maneuvers. This tactic, reminiscent of the administration's early travel ban, allows for a lack of thorough legal examination and public scrutiny, thereby evading accountability for controversial policies. The piece highlights concerns about due process and the ethical implications of these strategies in governance.
The administration has found a legal strategy to help it obfuscate significant factual details: go fast.
The government is following a playbook established during the fight over the first Trump administration's travel ban, which barred entry into the United States from several majority-Muslim countries.
Collection
[
|
...
]