The article presents a series of provocative and absurd statements suggesting radical changes to the U.S. Constitution and society. The speaker critiques the Constitution's amendments as weak and expresses a desire to revert to an original draft, while endorsing specific amendments like the Second Amendment. The rhetoric addresses various topics, from eliminating certain M&M colors to bizarre environmental policies and mocking established international agreements. Throughout the statements, a tone of disdain is prevalent, reflecting an unconventional approach to governance that emphasizes actions framed in a populist, confrontational context.
* Abolish amendments. Makes Constitution look weak. I read Constitution. I read passages, I read areas, chapters. Nobody reads Constitution more than me! Nobody even knows what the Fourteenth means. Let's go back to first draft!
* No more brown or yellow M&M's. Low I.Q., emotionally unstable. Send back to factory-probably in shithole countries like Massachusetts. WHITE M&M's only! Merit-based!
Collection
[
|
...
]