A judge approved a party's proposed order based on fictitious cases, raising concerns about judicial oversight. Justice Breyer critiques the approach of originalism and textualism by arguing proponents seek recognition over winning arguments. Chief Justice John Roberts counters Breyer's critiques, focusing on the political outcomes of decisions rather than their validity. In legal practice, firms face challenges such as losing attorneys and reevaluating mergers. Additionally, new budget proposals aim to limit student loans, sparking debates about law school affordability.
Justice Breyer delivers well-crafted critiques that misunderstand that proponents aren't trying to win the argument, they're trying to have smart people treat them like they have ideas worth engaging.
The Chief Justice took time out of his busy schedule to clarify that people like Breyer may have detailed, powerful, constitutionally valid criticisms, but they're losers because SCOREBOARD! SIX VOTES, SUCKAS!
Collection
[
|
...
]