During a recent discussion, Stephen A. Smith confronted Bill O'Reilly about Trump's comments regarding a potential third presidential run, a notion legally constrained by the 22nd Amendment. While O'Reilly appeared dismissive of the seriousness of Trump's statements, Smith argued they should not be overlooked, illustrating a broader tension between traditional Republican values and Trump's unconventional approach. This debate reflects a growing partisan divide, with Democrats alarmed by potential constitutional violations and Republicans often rallying behind Trump’s candidacy. The dialogue underscored concerns about adherence to the Constitution amidst evolving party ideologies.
You and I got into it when we were on Cuomo's show a couple of weeks ago, Smith said. Steve Bannon comes on national television with a straight face first and then smirk thereafter talking about violating the Constitution of the United States, the 22nd Amendment.
Everybody just glosses over it! Wait a minute, you're a Republican voter out there. I thought your party was the party that preached about the Constitution!
JD Vance is the vice president. Marco Rubio is the secretary of state. You've got candidates within his cabinet that are more than qualified to run for reelection.
We gotta hold on to it. So we're gonna circumvent every principle we stood on?
Collection
[
|
...
]