The article outlines the complexities surrounding onshoring manufacturing to the U.S., highlighting challenges such as extended timelines for relocation, U.S. infrastructure issues, and a skills gap among workers. Despite higher costs associated with onshoring, it suggests potential benefits including job creation in construction and advanced manufacturing. Additionally, it critiques Nina Jankowicz's defense regarding disinformation efforts, stating that her claims about the Global Engagement Center's lack of censorship are misleading, especially in the context of allegations of censorship against conservative media.
While onshoring raises costs, a manufacturing renaissance would have short- and long-term benefits, such as new jobs in construction and higher-paying advanced manufacturing jobs.
Shifting manufacturing into the U.S. takes three to 10 years due to intricate machinery and state and local permitting and environmental reviews.
Jankowicz's claim that the State Department's Global Engagement Center was never engaged in anything approaching censorship is abjectly false.
By running cover for Beijing, GDI was effectively complicit in the Chinese government's propaganda efforts, contradicting Jankowicz's defense.
Collection
[
|
...
]